Experts may be directed to attend the immigration tribunal in person or by video where their evidence is contested, the issues are complex, or the tribunal requires oral evidence for fair determination. Oral evidence allows cross-examination and, where directed, concurrent evidence (hot-tubbing).
Experts must know their report thoroughly, maintain independence under challenge, and distinguish clearly between assumed facts and expert opinion. The Adam Pipe October 2025 guide addresses tribunal attendance expectations, preparation, and the expert's duty to assist the tribunal.
Fee structures for tribunal attendance are separate from report preparation fees. Solicitors should confirm availability, attendance fees, and travel requirements at instruction. LAA prior authority covers attendance disbursements in legally aided cases where approved.
Hot-tubbing and concurrent evidence directions are increasingly used in complex multi-expert cases. Experts prepare joint statements identifying agreed facts and disputed issues before the hearing. See our tribunal process guide on hot-tubbing for detailed procedure.
Related Resources
- Hot-tubbing guide
- Expert report fees & timelines
- CPIN & Country Guidance
- Report standards
- Network directory
- Contact us
Frequently Asked Questions
When should an expert attend the tribunal in person?
Where the expert's evidence is contested, the issues are complex, or the tribunal directs attendance. Oral evidence allows cross-examination and concurrent evidence (hot-tubbing) where directed.
How should experts prepare for tribunal cross-examination?
Experts must know their report thoroughly, maintain independence under challenge, and distinguish between assumed facts and expert opinion. Adam Pipe 2025 guide addresses tribunal attendance expectations.