Country Guidance (CG) cases before the Upper Tribunal establish binding precedent on country conditions for specific profiles. Expert evidence is central to CG challenges — experts must apply the CG framework and cite authoritative dated sources.
Where CG and CPIN conflict, tribunals must follow CG. Experts identify CPIN gaps, apply CG methodology, and provide profile-specific analysis that informs the country guidance determination.
CG expert reports require the highest evidential standards. Independence under Ikarian Reefer principles is scrutinised closely. Experts may be directed to attend the UT and give oral evidence in CG cases.
Related Resources
- CPIN & Country Guidance
- Upper Tribunal process
- How to instruct
- Contact us
- Report types hub
- CPIN challenge reports
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the expert's role in country guidance cases?
Experts provide authoritative country condition analysis applying the CG framework to specific profiles. Evidence informs binding UT precedent on country conditions.
Do CG cases require different experts than standard appeals?
The same expert disciplines apply but CG cases require deeper sourcing, CG framework analysis, and often oral evidence at the Upper Tribunal.